Contra Fighter

The NEW Obama Scandals List!

This is the new list of Obama Scandals and Lies as of December 10, 2013 from Conservative American.org .

The list is long, but it is documented.  So if your friends say what a great President he is, you can send them this list of their hero in the Oval Office.

    BOWE BERGDAHL

  1. Obama Trades 5 Islamist Terrorists & 6 Dead Americans for one Traitor!

    6/4/14 –

    Time.com Pic - Click2Visit

    Time.com Pic – Click2Visit

    The more we learn about the case of Bowe Berghdal, the more troubling the President’s behavior becomes. The Rolling Stone magazine “has details of Bergdahl’s background and the New York Times has emails that prove Bergdahl was ashamed to be an American.” The military never listed him as a POW. He walked away. Yet the military went out and tried to “rescue” (recover is probably a better word) Bergdahl in an operationthat left six Americans dead. Ah, but as Hillary Clinton would say, “What difference, at this point, does it make?! We have six dead Americans!” Then, President Barack Hussein Obama, who attended a Muslim School in Indonesia, trades five Islamist Terrorist leaders to get this man back?! Barack Obama is so proud he has helped yet another “victim” of US Aggression against Muslims, that he parades the parents out for cameras at the White House! THis is disgusting. His foreign policy is designed to fundamentally transform the nation. The man who won’t say “War on Terror” preferring “overseas contingency operation” instead, has made another awful mistake. The man uncomfortable with the word “victory,” who is planning to simply leave Afghanistan without victory, has once again apologized for the USA’s behavior by carrying out this illegal deal. Congress must act against this President now. Or, the people should peacefully rise up and act against both the President and the Congress.

    BENGHAZI

  2. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 1 The attack was because of a video someone put online!

    The great website, “Simply Sick of It!” details some of Team Obama’s most outrageous lies designed to hide the truth from the American people about the attack in Benghazi, Libya. The real goal, of course, was to ensure Obama’s 2012 election victory. From Simply Sick of It:
    Perhaps the biggest lie of the entire scandal, the made up notion that a video no one watched caused this, this is a lie both Barack Obama and Hillary 2016 Clinton told to family members of those killed. A disgrace that should have forced both from office and needs to keep Hillary out of the White House. This lie was made up to give these two politicians cover for the awful mishandling of the attack. From the Washington Times: ““I was told a few things, and they were all lies,” said Pat Smith, mother of State Department officer Sean Smith. She said President Obama and his top aides came up to her at the casket ceremony when her son’s body was returned to the U.S. “Every one of them came up to me, gave me a big hug, and I asked them what happened. Please tell me. And every one of them said it was the video. And we all know that it wasn’t the video. Even at that time they knew it wasn’t the video. So they all lied to me,” she said.” – Meanwhile, Team Hillary made sure the YouTube movie maker stayed in jail for months, despite not taking part in anything illegal. “Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who produced the “Innocence of Muslims” video blamed for inciting the Sept. 11 attacks in Benghazi, urged the White House to be more careful in its assessments in the future, National Review Online reported. “Before you do anything, please give yourself time to think about it,” he told the Obama administration in an interview Tuesday with CNN.” – “That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video, sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.” — President Obama. James Rosen at Fox News also provided proof of this lie.

  3. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 2 What Difference Does it Make that Hillary and Obama Lied?

    This one should put an end to any chance the Hillary 2016 camp has…

    hillaryvideocover-300x228

    Hillary & Obama Lied. People Died.

  4. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 3 No Man Left Behind Lie

    Barack Obama broke a sacred pact those in the military have with each other. As the Commander-in-Chief, President Obama decided it was okay to leave a man behind, to leave four men behind, and simply Let them Die! The decision was reportedly made in the African Central Command location of the US Military to send in help immediately. The only person who could have changed that decision was President Barack Obama himself. The General who wanted to send in help was quickly “retired” after the incident. The sacred trust a soldier should have has been shattered. These brave men and women no longer know if the White House will have their backs.

  5. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 4 There was Plenty of Security in Benghazi!

    This lie, also designed to cover for Hillary 2016, is nonsense! As Simply Sick of It put it: “While the administration proffers the compound in Benghazi was well secured, impartial experts on the matter obviously disagree.”

  6. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 5 And BTW, Why were we in Benghazi in the first place?!

    Conservative American Glenn Beck has been a champion on this issue. Remember President Reagan’s Iran-Contra scandal? That’s the one with Col. Oliver North in the White House basement sending arms to the Contra rebels in exchange for Iran freeing the American hostages they held under President Jimmy Carter. While we were all told how horrible that was for Reagan to do, the socialist-democrat press remains uninterested in the story that this is what was going on in Benghazi. Team Obama had an operation in that location to smuggle weapons to Syrian rebels. Remember, in Syria both sides are “the bad guys” and many rebels are Al Qaeda! That’s a boring story though, so of course, no coverage. Thanks Glenn for keeping it up! See Benghazi Lie #14 below where the video (at 2:02) discusses this. The Canadian Free Press reported the lies were necessary to cover up the USA’s covert operation there to secretly arm anti-Assad rebels in Syria by funneling arms from Libya. Even the liberal, annoying, self-centered Geraldo Rivera said his sources also told him the whole reason for the staff to be in Benghazi was to arm the Syrian Rebels. Obama and Hillary Clinton needed that fact hidden as well. He compared it to the Iran-Contra affair and said it merited a gigantic investigation.

  7. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 6 Obama Can’t Answer a Simple Question about Benghazi

    As Simply Sick of It puts it, “Obama was going to be ”the most transparent Administration in history”, yet he can’t seem to even answer a simple question about Benghazi.”

  8. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 7 “Benghazi is not About the 2012 Elelction!”

    Oh, please! Give us a break, Mr. Obama. As you heard in the video above, His Barackness lied saying the “election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out what happened.” Yeah, right. Selling swamp land too, Mr. Prez? With the help of a willing and complacent press, the entire issue was simply tabled until after the election because the mishandling of the attack would have resulted in a big Obama loss. James Rosen also provided evidence this claim was untrue. The story was changed and the motive was the election.

  9. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 8 “Nobody wants to find out… More than I do!”

    This one makes me livid. The President consistently plays this “Nobody out there, Nobody but me” card that he learned from a Pretender’s song about how special he is. What a crock. The truth is Nobody wanted to prevent anyone from finding out anything more than he did. The President of the United States is a Big Fat Liar.

  10. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 9 – “We’re going to bring those folks to justice”

    Another lie. Reporters went to Libya and had coffee with the mastermind of the attack in a public coffee shop. They found him. Surely Team Obama knew where he was as well. No action (again). No arrests. No bombings. No demands. Must have been a video, bla, bla, bla. President Obama destroyed the sacred trust among the military which says, “No man left behind.” He has no intention of bringing anyone to justice ever. To do so would be to admit this was a terrorist attack and he left our men there to die. – “And make no mistake: We will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.” — President Obama

  11. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 10 – People were held Accountable?!

    From Sick of It comes another, “Hilary Clinton accepted the resignations of four personnel. Well, kind of. She accepted the resignations enough to get some headlines from the toe-the-line lame-stream media. But, that pesky ol’ Fox News and their propaganda (Progressive to Sanity translation: Journalism) managed to scrounge up the interesting way the State Department defines “resignation”.”
    And the Washington Times reported the four people were simply put back to work elsewhere in the government!

  12. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 11 There was no Confusion

    From the Couric-BS (CBS) Network, comes this one: “[Dick] Cheney accused during an interview on Fox News Monday… “They tried to cover it up by constructing a false story, claiming there was confusion about what had happened in the Benghazi compound. There was no confusion… If they’d told the truth about Benghazi, that it was a terrorist attack by an al Qaeda-affiliated group, it would have destroyed the false image of competence that was the basis of his campaign for re-election.” Dictator Obama denied this saying, “there is no there, there.”

  13. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 12 “I said it was terrorism the next day!”

    While the President made general statements about acts of terror, he did NOT (sorry Candy Crowely, YOU are a Big Fat Liar!) say the specific attack in Benghazi was itself terrorism. From the Washington Post’s Fact-Checker:
    “Notably, during a debate with Republican nominee Mitt Romney, President Obama said that he immediately told the American people that the killing of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans in Libya “was an act of terror.” But now he says he called it “an act of terrorism.” Some readers may object to this continuing focus on words, but presidential aides spend a lot of time on words. Words have consequences. Is there a difference between “act of terror” and “act of terrorism”? The Facts – Immediately after the attack, the president three times used the phrase “act of terror” in public statements: “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.” — Obama, Rose Garden, Sept. 12 – “We want to send a message all around the world — anybody who would do us harm: No act of terror will dim the light of the values that we proudly shine on the rest of the world, and no act of violence will shake the resolve of the United States of America.” – — Obama, campaign event in Las Vegas, Sept. 13 -[&]- “I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly present to the rest of the world. No act of violence shakes the resolve of the United States of America.” — Obama, campaign event in Golden, Colo., Sept. 13. -…he did not affirmatively state that the American ambassador died because of an “act of terror.”

  14. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 13 We Could Not Get the Military to Benghazi on time to Help

    This one is a whopper of a lie that even Obama’s Defense Secretary admitted was NOT true…
    As Simply Sick of It notes: ” Interestingly, the same Secretary of Defense that said they could have responded militarily also said they could not have responded militarily. Damn this internet machine and all of these recordings all over the place. It really puts a damper on deception.” More evidence that this claim is false comes from Fox News’s James Rosen who proved Mr. Obama knew about the attack within minutes, nearly 8 hours before two former Navy Seals would be killed. That’s plenty of time to get the military there.

  15. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 14 Hey! No One Asked for Military Support!

    Newsy covers this lie very well…
    Panetta’s lie about the “basic principle” being that you don’t deploy forces into harms way without knowing exactly what was going on, is one that should shame him his entire life. No, Mr. Panetta, that is NOT the “basic principle.” The basic principle that applies here to this situation is “Leave no man behind.” Also, if no one asked for military help that night, then why was General Ham “retired” within hours of the event?

  16. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 15 We didn’t have real time data to justify Military Action

    As you see in the Newsy video above, Leon Panetta says gosh, they just didn’t have real time information about what was going on to know if they should send troops in. Interesting, CBS News reported they had drones flying over the scene the last few hours of the attack relaying information to commanders. Hillary Clinton also claimed there was no real time data. Fox News has proof this is not true here.

  17. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 16 Hid the Survivors from Congress

    As reported in the Washington Times, ““Since the terrible tragedy that took four American lives in Benghazi, we’ve had a difficulty — to put it mildly — trying to get to the bottom of this,” Mr. [Republican Senator John] Cornyn said, Politico reported. “Now the goal is to talk to the Benghazi survivors, the people who were actually there, who can tell the truth and expose what happened and hold the people responsible accountable. This has been a cover-up from the very beginning.” …some lawmakers, as well as family members of victims, say the White House steadfastly is refusing to allow witnesses — especially contractors who were on scene but injured — to speak freely about the attack. And it’s all part of an administration-wide concealment, they accuse.”

  18. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 17 Hillary Got to See (Edit?) Report before it went Public

    So if everything was on the up and up, and we know it wasn’t, why would the Benghazi investigators give Hillary 2016 an advanced look at the report? Did she have an opportunity to edit the report? From the Washington Times: “Retired Adm. Mike Mullen, vice chairman of the accountability review board, also acknowledged that he had warned Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff not to send a particular official to Congress because he thought “she would be a weak witness” who might have hurt the State Department’s stance.” – How do you spell FAKE REPORT?! – “The White House and State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two ?? of these two institutions were changing the word consulate to diplomatic facility because consulate was inaccurate.” — Jay Carney

  19. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 18 Hillary a Year After Benghazi – Still Makes no Difference!

    The Washington Times notes, “The administration, including then-Secretary of State Clinton, vowed to investigate and bring to justice the guilty parties, but the issue has since fallen to the wayside.” She got heckled at a speech she gave exactly one year after the attack, but few noticed.

  20. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 19 Hillary Clinton Screaming Mad She’ll Get Caught Lying about Benghazi!!

    Cheryl Chumley at the Washington Times reports, “Rep. Adam Kinzinger, Illinois Republican, said he was shocked when former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton actually screamed at one of his congressional colleagues during a closed-door session to discuss Benghazi, Libya, just days after the terrorist attack. “Two days after this attack, we were in a briefing with Hillary Clinton and she screamed at a member of Congress who dared suggest that this was a terrorist attack,” Mr. Kinzinger said earlier this week during a town hall meeting with constituents in Rochelle, Ill., the Blaze reported. “Now we find out that while it was happening, they knew it was a terrorist attack.”

  21. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 20 Team Hillary Changed the Talking Points

    For weeks after the attack, The cussing and spitting Susan Rice, Hillary 2016 Clinton, Barack Obama and others all stuck to the talking points. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland is in big trouble. She accidentally told the truth stating that her “building leadership” (her building is the State Department, the leader is Hillary) wanted the original talking points changed. Conservative American Rep. Darrell Issa wants to know exactly who she was talking about

  22. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 21 No Warning of the Attack

    While Team Obama said there was no warning of a pending attack, Flopping Aces says that’s not true: “…Event Staff at the US special mission in Benghazi woke on 11 September to the sight of a Libyan policeman, deployed to guard them, filming the compound from a neighbouring rooftop. When challenged, he vanished. Later, an unmarked car made lazy circles around the compound, a walled redoubt rented in the southern suburbs of the Libyan city…” The aces at Flopping Aces also report US Ambassador Chris Stevens had received a “veiled warning” two days prior to the 9/11 attack. Hillary 2016 Clinton also claimed there was no advance warning of the attack. “We had no actionable intelligence that said an attack on our post in Benghazi was planned or iminent.” BS! The CIA had warned the administration ahead of time as had the ambassador himself. Glenn Beck notes that local Libyan authorites had told staff at the post three days prior to the attack that deteriorating security conditions were “frightening. It scares us…” Gregory Hicks also said his contacts warned him in advance of impending attacks. Hillary lied, people died.

  23. Benghazi Lies – # 22 Compound Had Been Fortified

    Really? The Hillary-Obama administration said the walls of the compound had been built up to 12′ tall and had barbed wire at the top. Yet Flopping Aces notes, “…Most of the wall running around the compound had not been heightened beyond around 8ft. The rear wall also had no wire. Two days after the attack the landlord showed the Guardian where attackers had scrambled over. “It was easy for them,” he said…” More on these lies from the U.K. Guardian…

    benghazi-300x206

    Click for Video

  24. Benghazi Lies – # 23 Hillary’s ‘Security was more than Adequate!’ Lie

    Uhm…no, it wasn’t. The Hillary Clinton State Department wants to you look over there instead of at this one. Her department claimed security was more than adequate. However, Flopping Aces notes, “…Stevens had cabled three times (7 June, 9 July, and 15 August) asking for more protection or that plans to draw down security be halted…Stevens cabled Washington to say that security in Benghazi was left dangerously exposed…In addition, the police officers supposed to guard the mission were often late. “Many hours pass when we have no police support at all”, he wrote.”

  25. Benghazi Lies – # 24 Hillary’s Gunfight Lie

    Hillary’s State department accounts say “the agents were under prolonged fire throughout their ordeal, with battle raging in the compound grounds. “There is considerable firing going on outside,” one spokesman briefed journalists. “There are tracer bullets. There is smoke … there are explosions. I can’t tell you that they were RPGs, but I think they were RPGs. So there’s a lot of action going on.” Conflicting evidence: The testimony of heavy fighting is hard to reconcile with the lack of bullet holes in the buildings. The villa’s sandy walls are still blackened by the smoke from the fire, but there are few bullet marks here or on the other buildings, nor are there spent casings visible…”

  26. Benghazi Lies – # 25 “It was a Video!”

    The cussing and spitting Susan Rice went on every TV station known to man and repeated the Hillary 2016-Team Obama lie that the whole thing was caused by a video no one ever saw. “Rice said she believed the attack was the result of a protest against the Innocence of Muslims film which had escalated: “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annexe,…” To the contrary, this was a well-planned and scheduled attack on the anniversary of the 2001 9/11 attack on New York. There was no protest or demonstration that took place in Benghazi. From Glenn Beck comes this Rice quote: “Our current best assessment based on the information we have at present is that in fact what this began as was a spontaneous, not a premeditated, response to what had transpired in Cairo.” — Susan Rice. The testimony now proves that the administration knew in advance. “Was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video.” — Susan Rice. President Obama, who also repeated this lie two weeks after the attack at the United Nations, despite knowing within an hour of the attack that this was untrue.

  27. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 26 This is my Top Priority!

    How many times has the President said the economy was his top priority? It never was. With Benghazi, “Obama said the investigation into the attacks remained “top priority”. He added: “We’re going to stay on it until we get them.” Top priority my rear! The top Hillary 2016-Obama 2012 priority was to bury this story and distract the media at least until after the election. Though journalists were on the site of compound within days (one even grabbed Ambassador Stevens’ journal), it took the Hillary-Obama team 4 weeks to get the FBI to the site. As Flopping Aces points out, when the French Embassy was attacked, the French investigators were there the next day. Probably their leader was not up for re-election at the time?

  28. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 27 Lie about Protests

    President Obama himself lied about protests overheating as the cause of the pre-planned attack. He knew within hours that this was a terrorist attack and deliberately lied to America so he could win re-election. “What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.” — President Obama. None of that was true. There never was a protest in Benghazi. That is a lie that Hillary Clinton and Team Obama repeated over and over.

  29. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 28 This is Mitt Romney’s Fault!

    From Conservative American Glenn Beck: ” “But the entire reason that this has become the, you know, political topic it is is because of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.” — Stephanie Cutter (Obama’s campaign spokesperson).” THAT was the reason people were discussing what happened?!!! No chance in hell that was the reason, Miss Stephanie. People actually care when a President leaves men behind to die in battle.

  30. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 29 Lie about Limiting Free Speech

    President and King-wannabe Barack Obama made up another straw man and claimed that some people want him to limit free speech, but he just can’t. “I know there are some who ask, why don’t we just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws. Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.” — President Obama.

  31. Benghazi Lies – # 30 The Attackers Blamed the Video!! L – I – E !

    Hillary 2016 Clinton actually claimed it was the bad guys in the Benghazi attack who blamed all of this on the video!! In fact, it was she and President Obama who did so. Glenn Beck has the Hillary quote: “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.” — Hillary Clinton. — Yep. Some did, Hillary. Some who wanted to win an election to the White House like YOU and Mr. Obama! “To address the video circulating on the Internet that has led to these protests.” — Hillary Clinton.

  32. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – # 31 No Evidence this Was Pre-Planned!

    White House spokesdude Jay Carney lied to the American people claiming there was no evidence the Benghazi attack was pre-planned, when in fact the White House already knew that it was. “And it is in response, not to United States policy, not to obviously the administration, not to the American people. It is in response to a video.” -From Glen Beck’s report: “Now we do not yet have indication that it was preplanned or premeditated.” – Jay Carney.
    Really? Because we actually know that you had information that the attack was premeditated days before the attack took place. One of the people in Benghazi called the State Department with concerns warning of the attack. Oops.

  33. Benghazi Lies – # 32 Lie About Requests for Help

    Vice President Joey Buttafucoco Biden lied about Benghazi too. From Glenn Beck: “Reporter: “And CBS has learned that the U.S. mission in Libya reportedly ?? repeatedly asked for better security before last month’s attack on the American consulate in Benghazi. A State Department officer says there were 13 confirmed security threats in the six months before the attack. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed three weeks ago.” — “Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security and we did not know they wanted more security again.” — Joe Biden. That’s a lie.

  34. Benghazi Lies – # 33 CIA Hasn’t Figured This Out Yet!

    David Astroturf Axelrod got in on the Benghazi game too, creating more lies. Glenn Beck caught him. “It’s not a matter of blaming, that’s just the facts. Sometimes intelligence has to catch up with the reality on the ground. This was one of those cases.” — David Axelrod – [GLENN BECK:] Doesn’t the intelligence normally come from information on the ground? Throwing the CIA under the bus is never the smart choice, David.” The intelligence on the ground was fine and accurate. That’s a fact and the President knew that within an hour of the attack.

  35. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – #34 ‘We didn’t write the talking points!’

    Team Obama also tried to pitch the intelligence community under the bus saying all of the talking points came from them! Jay Carney promised Americans they based it on the best info they had at the time. As Glenn Beck notes, however, Obama’s State Department, run by Hillary 2016 Clinton had significant input on the talking points. One reporter said he obtained 12 different edits/versions of the talking points which showed they were dramatically altered by the administration.

  36. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – #35 ‘We only made one tiny change to the Talking Points’

    Jay Carney also claimed the administration, through Hillary Clinton’s State Department only made one change to the talking points. He said they changed the word “consulate” to “diplomatic post.” Another lie. There were 12 MAJOR revisions to the original talking points.

  37. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – #36 ‘The edits didn’t change the substance of the talking Points’ Lie

    Another whopper from Jay Carney. Yes, they did change the substance. Carney: “Non-substantive factual corrections” were made. Mmmm hmmm. The Hillary Clinton State Department deleted all references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group, for example.

  38. Benghazi Lies – #37 Hillary Deleted Info about CIA Warnings She Ignored

    One of the talking points edits, was made to advance the Hillary 2016 campaign. That edit removed any reference from the talking points that for months, the CIA had warned of terrorist threats in Benghazi! Nah, can’t have that in their. That makes it look like Hillary just ignored the situation. That’s because SHE DID!

  39. Benghazi Lies – #38 Hillary lies to the faces of the killed men’s families

    Hillary 2016 Clinton told the families of the murdered Americans that this was because of some video and that the USA was going to do everything it could to make sure the guy who made the video went to jail! She knew from editing the talking points that this video had nothing to do with the murders at all. Saying so, however, would have hurt her own selfish 2016 political ambitions. So her choice was to tell the truth to the families and risk ruining her chances of living in the White House again, or to lie to their faces and scream, “What difference, at this point, does it make?!”

  40. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – #39 Jails a man He Knew was Innocent just to win 2012 Reelection!

    Hillary - What difference does it make?

    Hillary – What difference does it make?

    Because of the video lie, Barack Obama and the selfish Hillary Clinton decided they would have the man who made the video arrested. He was arrested and taken to jail where he remained for months. The two of them both knew that the man had committed no crime at all. He did, however, pose a threat to their own political futures! This is the United States of America and President Obama and President-wannabe-Hillary Clinton had the power to jail an innocent man to protect their own rear ends! This is a horrible disgrace that should have resulted in both of them leaving office and going to jail themselves. This is certainly criminal behavior to lie about a made-up crime and see to it that the person they wanted to take the fall for them was put in jail. This abuse of power is a tremendous threat to our republic. If a President or a Secretary of State can just have any opponent jailed for any made-up reason, we are no longer free. This is likely why Hillary Clinton once admitted she has “never understood the two-party system,” instead favoring a single party, her own. Obama and Mrs. Clinton are two very scary people for anyone who cares about preserving this great nation.

  41. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – #40 “We were not clear” about what happened

    “Immediately after this event happened, we were not clear who exactly had carried it out, how it had occurred, what the motivations were.” – Barack Obama May 14th, 2013. That’s a lie. They knew immediately this was carried out by a group affiliated with Al Qaeda. On that same date he repeated the video lie, claiming an attack on our embassy in Cairo, Egypt was because of a video. Glenn Beck reports the protests in Egypt were not about the movie either and the President had known that since day one. “It is,” said Beck, “A mountain of lies!”

  42. Obama’s Benghazi Lies – #41 Obama Pretended He Was Offended!

    Another lie Obama told just to get reelected took place at a Presidential debate with Mitt Romney. “And the suggestion that anybody in my team, the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, anybody on my team would play politics or mislead when we’ve lost four of our own, Governor, is offensive!” Yet that is EXACTLY what happened. The President, the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador and everybody on Obama’s team played politics and mislead the nation for their own political gain. It is indeed offensive.

  43. Benghazi Lies – #42 Rice Lying for 15 Months!

    Even in late December of 2013, Susan Rice says she has no regrets for the lies she told and she wants you to think this is some made-up “False Controversy!”

  44. Benghazi Lies – #43 I had a hard week!

    Hillary 2016 Clinton was just too darn tired to do those weekend talk shows. Turns out that’s why they sent out Susan Rice. At least that is what Rice is telling CBS News at the end of 2013. She says poor Hillary had just finished a really, really hard week and she (RICE) imagines Hillary was just too tired to do the interviews herself!!! She can’t be serious! It is EASY, not hard, for the Clintons to lie. That’s all Hillary Clinton did that week was lie about what happened. And how dare Susan Rice say that HILLARY CLINTON had a hard week?! It wasn’t Hillary Clinton, it wsa the families of the four Benghazi victims that had the hard week and have had a hard 15 months since the attack. Susan Rice is a Liar, just like Hillary Clinton.

  45. Obama’s Benghazi Lies #44 -White House says Benghazi Story was “Concocted” by Republicans!”

    White House spinster Jay Carney told reporters the scandals are made-up, “You’re concocting scandals here that just don’t exist, especially Benghazi.”

  46. Obama’s Benghazi Lies #45 – White House Lied About 9/11 Readiness in Press Release!

    1/14/13 From James Rosen of Fox News, who was himself a target of the Obama Administration comes this report: “…On Sept. 10, 2012 — the day before Al Qaeda-linked terrorists carried out the bloody assault on the U.S. consulate and a related annex in Benghazi — the White House Press Office issued a press release entitled “Readout of the President’s Meeting with Senior Administration Officials on Our Preparedness and Security Posture on the Eleventh Anniversary of September 11th.” A set of “Top Secret” documents obtained by Fox News reveals that the nation’s highest-ranking uniformed military officer, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified to Congress in executive session last year that the Sept. 10 meeting “was actually a conference call.” Moreover, Dempsey testified, Libya was never even discussed during the call, despite a persistent and increasingly worrisome stream of threat reporting from that country, and from Benghazi in particular. The Sept. 10 press release stated that the session had covered the “specific measures we are taking” and “steps taken” to protect Americans and U.S. facilities abroad. It also related an order from President Obama for all agencies to “do everything possible to protect the American people, both at home and abroad.” Yet the declassified documents show that Dempsey testified to the Congress last year that not a single directive had been issued by him or Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to adjust American military force posture anywhere in the world as the 9/11 anniversary loomed just hours away…”

  47. Benghazi Lies – # 46 It wasn’t Al Qaeda

    1/15/14 Hillary Clinton said there was a protest. That wasn’t true and she knew that at the time she said it. She said that a video caused the attack. That wasn’t true and she knew that at the time she said it. This wasn’t because of Al Qaeda or a pre-planned terror attack, she told us. Today, the US Senate (run by DEMOCRATS!) said not so fast. From Fox News: “A comprehensive report by the Senate Intelligence Committee definitively declared that individuals tied to Al Qaeda groups were involved in the Benghazi attack, challenging recent claims that the terror network was not a factor. The report was released Monday, nearly one year after then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, under congressional questioning over the nature of the attack, shouted at lawmakers: “What difference, at this point, does it make?””

  48. Benghazi Lies – # 47: CIA Agent With Ties to Hillary 2016 Campaign Altered Benghazi Talking Points!

    2/3/14 – Reporter Catherine Herridge at FOX news has done a very thorough job reporting on the Benghazi cover-up which was designed to get President Obama re-elected in 2012 and to help Hillary Clinton become president in 2016. She reported today that former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell left inaccurate items in the Benghazi talking points. He met with a reporter for the Wall Street Journal in August of 2013, while still on the job, which reported his interest in “advising future presidential campaigns.” The WSJ said Morell is “close” to Hillary according to officials they did not name. So, was Morell campaigning for a future job with Team Hillary when he altered the talking points? Did he communicate with Hillary Clinton or her advisers at all when he changed the content to help Obama and Clinton? Herridge spoke with Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch who said, “You have to wonder what he was thinking at the time when he deleted these talking points in a way that benefited the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton personally.” Morell now works for Beacon Global strategies, a company founded by Philippe Reines, who Herridge reports was “recently described by the New York Times magazine as [Hillary] Clinton’s personal gatekeeper…”
    ConservativeAmerican.org believes this evidence clearly shows that Team Hillary changed those talking points to benefit Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016. The talking points were indeed changed for political reasons, something President Obama denied one day earlier when speaking with Bill O’Reilly on live TV.

  49. Benghazi Lies – # 48: Security was Lax? Susan Rice said it was Strong!

    2/2/14 Republicans are upset that President Obama said in a Superbowl interview that it was apparent security at the Benghazi post was “lax.” That’s a bit of a revelation considering both Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton said security was sufficient.

  50. Benghazi Lies – # 49: Obama Lied again, Claiming He Said “The Next Day” that Benghazi was a Terrorist Attack.

    2/2/14 – The President told Bill O’Reilly his lie again about saying the day after Benghazi that it was a terror attack. He did no such thing. He simply added a sentence in his statement that day that said the U.S. is against terrorism around the world. He did not say this specific incident was a terrorist attack. What he did say was, ““No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation.” See?! He used similar phrases in statements the next day in Las Vegas and Golden, Colorado. This is a lie. The President is hoping if he tells the lie often enough, people will begin to believe it. This lie is also why Mitt Romney lost the election. When the President made the claim during a debate with Romney, democrat Candy Crowley jumping in to help, Romney needed to pounce on him, read the quote, and make his point. Instead, he stood dumbfounded and let it go.

  51. Benghazi Lies – # 50: Won’t Tell America if Sec. Panetta told him this was Terrorism!

    2/2/14 – Despite telling interviewer Bill O’Reilly that he was answering the question, he never did. He was asked if Sec. Leon Panetta told him when they met less than an hour after the attack began, that the incident was indeed a terrorist attack. It’s a yes or no question. If he tells the truth and says yes, then he has to explain his lies about the video and a made-up protest and he’ll have to explain why he lied to the families of the victims. If he says, “No,” he risks Panetta coming out and revealing that yes, he did tell him. Either way he loses.

  52. Benghazi Lies – # 51: General Confirms Obama and Hillary were Lying from Day One about Benghazi!

    5/1/14 –

    CBS NY Pic Click2Visit

    CBS NY Pic Click2Visit

    Oren Dorell at USA Today writes, “U.S. military personnel knew early on that the Benghazi attack was a “hostile action” and not a protest gone awry, according to a retired general who served at U.S. Africa Command’s headquarters in Germany during the attack. While the exact nature of the attack was not clear from the start, “what we did know early on was that this was a hostile action,” retired Air Force brigadier general Robert Lovell said in his prepared statement Thursday morning to members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. “This was no demonstration gone terribly awry…” …While people on the ground were fighting for their lives, discussions among U.S. leaders outside Libya “churned on about what we should do,” but the military waited for a request for assistance from the State Department, Lovell said. There were questions about whether the U.S. military could have responded to Benghazi in time, but “we should have tried,” Lovell said…” – ConservativeAmerican.org added the emphasis. Also note that the general was waiting for a request for help from the Hillary Clinton State Department. Asleep at the phone when the call came at “3 in the morning,” Hillary never issued such a request. We still don’t know what her boss, President Obama, was doing while all of this was happening.

  53. Benghazi Lies – # 52: White House Email Proves (Again) Obama & Hillary Lied to the Faces of Family Members of those Killed in Benghazi!

    5/2/14 –

    Judicial Watch image Click2Visit

    Judicial Watch image Click2Visit

    What kind of low-life human being could knowingly lie to a grieving mother’s face about the cause of her son’s death? Hillary Clinton. More proof today of her numerous Benghazi lies from a White House email. From Judicial Watch comes this: “On April 18, 2014, JW obtained 41 new Benghazi-related State Department documents. They include a newly declassified email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.” Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack” and a possible kidnap attempt.” — From Bob Taylor at Communities Digital News; “The documents which have revitalized interest in Benghazi were obtained by the conservative watchdog group known as Judicial Watch. A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit has uncovered a September 14, 2012 e-mail from Ben Rhodes, a White House aide, to former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice just prior to her appearances on five Sunday morning news programs in the aftermath of the Benghazi attacks… Said [Senator Lindsey] Graham, “If this is not a smoking gun, proving beyond any doubt, the story told by the administration about Benghazi was politically motivated and fabricated, nothing will ever prove that.” …Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) wrote, “It is now abundantly clear that senior White House staff were directly involved in coordinating the messaging in response to the Benghazi attacks and were actively working to tie the reason to the infamous Internet video.” Actually, it has always been abundantly clear, but, until now, there has been no direct proof. This new evidence, however, has prompted Wolf to call for a select committee investigation which House Majority Leader John Boehner has long resisted.” [NOTE: Boehner finally appointed a select committee after news of this email surfaced. He named Conservative American U.S. Representative Trey Gowdy to lead the panel.

    IRS SCANDALS

  54. IRS # 1 -Obama Uses IRS to Stop Tea Party & Conservative Opponents!

    In another huge scandal in recent years, Team Obama was caught red-handed illegally using the IRS to target political opponents. One of the articles of impeachment against President Richard M. Nixon was that he thought about using the IRS to go after political opponents. President Barack Hugo Obama did more than just think about it, he did it! Scared to death after the 2010 Tea Party Conservative American landslide, he launched a full-scale effort to make sure the movement did not grow, could not fundraise, and would not defeat him in 2012. Real Clear Politics says “Obama’s Fingerprints All Over the IRS Scandal!”

  55. IRS # 2 -Obama’s IRS Subjects Tea Party Group to 55 Inappropriate Questions!

    5/13/13 After two years of waiting, the IRS finally sent one Conservative group a questionnaire. From the UK Daily Mail Online: “The Internal Revenue Service wrote to the Richmond Tea Party last year demanding to know the names of all its financial donors and volunteers, as part of a 55-question inquisition into its application for tax-exempt status, MailOnline has learned. The agency wanted to know ‘the names of the donors, contributors, and grantors’ for every year ‘from inception to the present.’ It also demanded ‘the amounts of each of the donations, contributions, and grants and the dates you received them.’v’How did you use these donations, contributions, and grants?’ the IRS asked. ‘Provide the details.’” – How convenient to have all the names and financial information from those who oppose you?!

  56. IRS # 3- Obama’s First Reaction: To Lie About the IRS Scandal!

    5/13/13 – From Mediaite.com: “Fox Business Network host Lou Dobbs stopped by Megyn Kelly‘s show on Monday afternoon to offer his reaction to President Obama‘s press conference — during which he responded to the IRS scandal involving the agency’s targeting politically conservative groups. Dobbs didn’t take well to Obama’s reaction and went after him for flat-out lying. “What is outrageous is that the president of the United States this morning stands before the American people and lies through his teeth,” Dobbs charged. “That is what is outrageous.” Kelly followed up, asking how exactly Obama was lying. Dobbs took issue with Obama’s conditional statement — that the IRS’ actions are outrageous if they’re true. “The president must have forgotten that the Internal Revenue Service took the extraordinary step last week and admitted doing these things and apologized for doing these things — and then this president…says that if they are found to have done these things, we will have to hold them accountable, as if that would not be his first and immediate and urgent action to take,” Dobbs explained. “This is a president who has lost his way.”

  57. IRS # 4 – Obama Pretended He ‘First Heard’ of the IRS scandal a Few Days Ago!

    Even the liberals aren’t buying this Obama lie. From Newsbusters on 5/15/13: “…he’s even under fire from Jon Stewart, host of “The Daily Show” on the Comedy Central cable channel, who said on Tuesday that the Democratic occupant of the White House “can’t keep saying you found out about news at the same time as us!” …[OBAMA:]”I first learned about it from the same news reports that I think most people learned about this. I think it was on Friday. And this is pretty straightforward.” Stewart mocked the mild manner Obama used in answering the question and… “I wouldn’t be surprised if President Obama learned Osama bin Laden had been killed when he saw himself announce it on television,” Stewart joked.” Newsbusters also points out that Jay Carney only a day or two earlier said the White House knew about this for several weeks. Oops.

  58. IRS # 5 – Democrats Blast IRS for not Telling Congress about Scandal a Year Ago!

    The democrat-party’s Chicago Tribune division reported on 5/17/13: “…Republicans and Democrats said senior IRS officials should have alerted Congress last year when they found out that their examiners were singling out Tea Party groups for intense scrutiny when the groups applied for tax-exempt status. “That isn’t being misled. That’s lying,” said Republican Dave Camp, the chairman of the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee. The acting head of the agency, Steven Miller, apologized for the IRS’s actions and said they stemmed from poor management, rather than a partisan desire to punish conservative groups. “I did not mislead Congress or the American people,” said Miller…” – THe President fired Miller.

  59. IRS # 6 – IRS Leader Lies by Omission

    From the great Breitbart.com 5/21/13: “Acting Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Douglas Shulman, who led the agency when it targeted Tea Party and conservative groups,…”What I knew sometime in the spring of 2012 was that there was a list that was being used, knew that the words ‘Tea Party’ were being used,” Shulman said, adding that he felt the proper approach was to ensure that there was an investigation. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) was not satisfied. “You didn’t mention any of this in any of your letters…It’s a lie by omission, and you kept it from people who have an obligation to oversee this matter,” he said.”

  60. IRS # 7 -Lois Lerner Gives Statement, Then Pleads the 5th

    lerner-300x185

    Click to visit NY Times

    wilkins-217x300

    Wilkins -Click for Daily Mail

    12/4/13 Why is it that so often we have to go to the British media to get the truth about US politics?! From the U.K. Daily Mail: “A top lawyer at the Internal Revenue Service told congressmen quizzing him over the tea party targeting scandal ‘I don’t recall’ a ‘staggering 80 times in fill or partial response to the committees questions’, a letter revealed today. The letter was sent to Chief counsel William Wilkins by two powerful House Republicans who gave him until December 10 to ‘amend’ his statements. The stinging letter from House Oversight Committee chair Rep. Darrell Issa and regulatory subcommittee chair Rep. Jim Jordan, read: ‘Your memory consistently failed when you were asked about information you shared with the Treasury Department’, adding his testimony ‘suggests either a deliberate attempt to obfuscate your involvement in this matter or gross incompetence on your part.’” The Mail notes that William Wilkins was hired by Obama. His previous job? He was Rev. Jeremiah “God D**n America!” Wright’s lawyer. So much for Obama’s lie that he wasn’t buddies with his old pastor anymore.

  61. IRS # 17 – Obama Flip-flops on IRS Scandal – from outrage to “made up!”

    December 9, 2013 In the Lonely Conservative: “Not to long [ago] he [Obama] was outraged over the tax agency targeting his political opponents. Now he says it was a controversy made up by the media. Fact: The IRS targeted conservative and tea party groups requesting tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. That’s a fact… Even White House spokesman Jay “Circus” Carney called the IRS‘ actions “inappropriate.” Fact… The media never asks him What new information was presented to you to change your opinion on the IRS scandal from “outrageous” to “phony scandal”?”
    Some on the left, like Politics.usa, agree with President Obama saying, look, liberals were targeted too. They apparently ‘forgot’ that Lois Lerner admitted the IRS was unfairly targeting Conservative groups. Yes, liberal groups also faced scrutiny (probably as a security policy in case the IRS got caught), but they did not face the same level of scrutiny. In fact, Rare.US reports the so-called “evidence” Politics USA uses showed the opposite of what they said it showed: “Representatives Elijah Cummings and Sander Levin on Tuesday hauled forth another tranche of documents that they say highlight “IRS scrutiny of progressive groups.” It is the duo’s sixth such effort, but this one, Cummings says, “should put a nail in the coffin” of the GOP’s claims that the agency’s actions were politically motivated or aimed exclusively at conservative organizations. That’s because, according to Levin, the latest papers show that IRS scrutiny “covered a broad spectrum of political ideology.” In fact, the documents show just the opposite.

  62. IRS # 18 – Obama Claims “Not even a smidgen” of corruption in IRS targeting of Conservatives!

    2/2/14 – Just before the Superbowl, President Obama told Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly that there were some “bone-headed” decisions made, but no corruption. Emails made public four days later (see below) show there was at least an organized effort to stop conservatives among various federal agencies. That certainly is corruption!

  63. IRS # 19 – Obama’s IRS Worked with Treasury Department to Target Conservatives “Off Plan”

    2/6/14 – Megyn Kelly at Fox News reported tonight that 2012 emails have been made public showing Lois Lerner communicated with people in the Treasury Department to target conservative groups “off plan.” One congressman said that to him, “off plan” means hidden from the public! Once the Supreme Court handled the so-called Citizens-United case, democrats went into panic-mode. The ruling allowed businesses and other organizations to become involved in politics the same way socialist-unions have for years. To the democrats, that just isn’t fair. The President even insulted the Justices of the Supreme Court during a state of the union address over this issue. Lerner and the Treasury Department were trying to find illegal ways to prevent non-democrat groups from getting involved in politics in any way. The emails could explain why Lois Lerner pleaded the 5th instead of answering questions put to her by congress. However, it does not explain why she said she had done nothing wrong. The emails prove she, in fact, did do things that were wrong and perhaps even illegal.

  64. IRS # 20 – From Outrageous to Not a Smidgen!

    2/2/14 After initially calling the IRS scandal “outrageous,” the President now says there’s not even a smidgen of corruption at the IRS. When he thought he was in VERY BIG trouble over this (It’s worse than what Nixon did), he called it outrageous and promised to hold people responsible. Once the obedient servant-media decided the story was boring and just another “phony” scandal, President Obama joined them. What a bunch of crap!

  65. IRS # 21 – FBI Corruption – Never even talked to Crime Victims!!

    1/14/14 – This shouldn’t surprise us. President Obama has made the IRS, the Department of Justice, the EPA, and now the FBI nothing more than political tools to do his dirty work. The FBI does not seem to care about the crimes this administration has committed against Conservative Americans and Tea Party supporters. From James Freeman at the Wall Street Journal: “THE FBI’S IRS OUTRAGE – The Journal reports that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is unlikely to file any criminal charges in the targeting of conservative political organizations by the Internal Revenue Service. Yet Cleta Mitchell, an attorney who represents many of the targets, says that the FBI has never contacted any of her clients to discuss their treatment at the hands of the IRS. “Shouldn’t law enforcement talk to the victims in an investigation?,” she asks in an email. “That’s like investigating a burglary without interviewing the burgled,” notes a Journal editorial.”

  66. IRS # 22 – FBI Corruption – Backed out of Promise to Meet with Congress!

    1/14/14 -WSJ: “The press corps suddenly cares a great deal about cancelled meetings in New Jersey state government. Perhaps they should be asking why the FBI at first promised that the official in charge of the IRS investigation, Valerie Parlave, would meet with Rep. Jim Jordan of the House Oversight Committee and then—after contacting a senior political appointee at Justice—declined to make her available.”

  67. IRS # 23 – Senior Level Government Officials Lied about the IRS Targeting Conservatives

    1/14/14 -James Freeman at the WSJ: “Beyond the harassment of Tea Party groups and the leaking of confidential taxpayer data to political opponents, the IRS case also involved senior government officials falsely assuring Congress for a year that there was no targeting. IRS brass then falsely and publicly claimed that the targeting was the work of low-level employees. Yet when it comes to allegations of misleading Congress, the Obama Justice Department was more interested in trying to prosecute baseball pitcher Roger Clemens for comments about steroids than it was in pursuing a case involving the use of the nation’s tax-collecting authority against the President’s opponents.”

  68. IRS # 24 – Oops! Team Obama says they Lost two Years of Emails from Lois Lerner!

    6/17/14 – While wimpy republicans stand by and do nothing, aggressive democrat-socialists take steps to make sure no one on Team Obama goes to jail for attacking conservatives using the IRS. The new White House claim is that gosh, some computer crashed and they just don’t have any IRS emails from Lerner to hand over to congress. Seems emails from at least six other IRS officials involved also have disappeared. Oh well, computers have problems, right? Give me a break. These are backed up and the backups are backed up. This is a deliberate move to keep the President and his pals out of jail. This is BS worthy of impeachment.

    NSA SPYING ON AMERICANS SCANDAL

  69. Obama’s NSA is Spying on Every Single American!

    June, 2103 – The U.K. Guardian was first to break the news. “The National Security Agency has obtained direct access to the systems of Google, Facebook, Apple and other US internet giants, according to a top secret document obtained by the Guardian. The NSA access is part of a previously undisclosed program called Prism, which allows officials to collect material including search history, the content of emails, file transfers and live chats, the document says. The Guardian has verified the authenticity of the document, a 41-slide PowerPoint presentation – classified as top secret with no distribution to foreign allies – which was apparently used to train intelligence operatives on the capabilities of the program. The document claims “collection directly from the servers” of major US service providers. Although the presentation claims the program is run with the assistance of the companies, all those who responded to a Guardian request for comment on Thursday denied knowledge of any such program… The program facilitates extensive, in-depth surveillance on live communications and stored information. The law allows for the targeting of any customers of participating firms who live outside the US, or those Americans whose communications include people outside the US. It also opens the possibility of communications made entirely within the US being collected without warrants.”

    DOJ TARGETING CONSERVATIVES

  70. Eric Holder using Department of Justice to Target Conservatives

    1/27/14 – Team Obama has what Conservative American U.S. Senator Ted Cruz calls a “pattern” of targeting conservatives. From FOXy Blondes News: “…federal prosecutors last week announced campaign finance charges against Dinesh D’Souza, the documentarian behind an anti-President Obama film released during the 2012 presidential campaign… But colleagues rallied to D’Souza’s defense, calling the decision to prosecute the case politically motivated. “When you make a film that hits the president between the eyes and could shift an election, you become a target,” conservative filmmaker Dennis Michael Lynch told Fox News, referring to D’Souza’s “2016: Obama’s America.” …U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement that the office and FBI take a “zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process.”” Zero tolerance?!! ConservativeAmerican.org asks, how can he say that with a straight face? They have complete tolerance for New Black Panther thugs in Philadelphia corrupting the electoral process! They have total tolerance for the son of a congresswoman from Milwaukee who was arrested for slashing tires of GOP vehicles on election morning. “Zero tolerance” my rear end! The racist Eric Holder has turned the DOJ into the DOJBO, Department of Justice for Blacks only.

    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ILLEGALLY TARGETS REPORTERS SCANDAL

  71. DOJ Scandal # 1 – Holder Lied About Targeting Reporters for Prosecution

    As Glenn Beck reports, Holder said, “That is not something that I have ever been involved with, heard of…” That’s odd, because Holder actually signed the paper that authorized the effort. Oh well, Holder probably figures if his boss can lie all the time and nothing happens, he probably can too. Holder signed off on the search warrant that allowed the Department of Justice to spy on reporters and their families.


    OBAMACARE

    ConservativeAmerican.org covered the Obamacare Nightmare Scandal extensively in regular posts/reports, including the President’s Biggest Lie, “If you like your plan, you can keep it.

    Here’s a list of 310 Obamacare broken promises and lies.

    Here are some other Obamacare Links…
    Another Illegal Change to Obamacare!
    Obamacare Rationing – Coming Soon to a Sickness Near You!
    Almost Everyone Will Lose Their Plan. Yep.
    Limbaugh Agrees – When it Comes to Obamacare, You Aint Seen Nothin’ Yet!
    Emanuel Brothers: What Difference Does it Make?

  72. Seattle Children’s Hospital Has to File Suit Against Obamacare to Get Care for Kids!

    2/10/14 – From National Review Online: “Seattle Children’s Hospital is taking legal action to correct a “false promise” of Obamacare. With only two out of the seven plans offered under Washington State’s health-care exchange covering treatment at the hospital, one of the state’s key providers of specialized pediatric care, it will sue the state’s insurance commissioner for “failure to ensure adequate network coverage.” “The exclusion of a major provider like Seattle Children’s for a major insurance network in this market is unprecedented,” said Dr. Sandy Melzer. For instance, CBS reported that four-year-old Kate Fink was denied coverage at the hospital for a ruptured eardrum because the plan her family purchased on the exchange didn’t include Seattle Children’s in its network.

  73. Administraton Announces Another illegal Obamacare Extension

    2/10/14 – After lecturing republicans with a sarcastic tone saying Obamacare was the “law of the land,” Team Obama has again unilaterally changed that law without the authority to do so. This is illegal and goes against the United States Constitution which President Obama swore to uphold. From FOX News, “The Obama administration announced another delay Monday in the requirement on businesses to provide health coverage to workers, giving some employers a reprieve next year while phasing in the mandate for others. The administration had already delayed the implementation of the so-called employer mandate by a year, initially pushing the requirements off until 2015 — past the midterm elections. In a concession to business, though, Treasury Department officials announced Monday that the administration would not enforce the rules across the board next year. Instead, the administration will let employers with 50 to 99 employees off the hook in 2015. They’ll be required to report on how many workers are covered but will have until 2016 before being required to cover full-time staff or pay a penalty…”

    LETTING VETERANS DIE TO SAVE MONEY

  74. The Obama Administraton Lets Veterans Die to save Money!

    4/24/14 – From the ChristianPost.com: “At least 40 U.S. veterans reportedly died after they were allegedly stuck for months on a secret waiting list to see doctors in the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Healthcare system. In what is being described as an elaborate scheme to make the VA hospital look more efficient than it really is, a CNN investigation has revealed that Veterans Affairs managers in Phoenix used a secret list to hide some 1,400 to 1,600 sick veterans who were being made to wait, well beyond the 14 to 30 days as per VA internal policy, before they were able to get appointments with doctors…”

    IRAQ SCANDAL

  75. President Obama Does Nothing While Iraq Falls to ISIS Terrorists

    6/17/14 – President Obama is uncomfortable with the word “victory” and is fine with the USA Losing the Iraq war. To him, the USA has had too large of a footprint around the world in the past, and if we would just stay home and stay out of it, things will be better. His foolish previous actions, his dangerous willingness to “team up” with our enemy, Iran, and his disregard for the lives of US Soldiers lost fighting in Iraq is a complete failure. Brit Hume says it makes the entire Obama Presidency a failure. This President is nearly an enemy of our nation who actually is running our nation!

  76. President Obama Sends 300 to Iraq to help him ‘Do Nothing’ While Iraq Falls to ISIS Terrorists

    6/19/14 – As we predicted, President Obama still is doing nothing about terrorists taking over Iraq. His first “big announcement” was that he would be “monitoring the situation” over “the next few days.” That only served to give advanced notice to the enemy that they had some time to keep moving prior to any possible action the USA might take. Yesterday’s “big announcement” was that he is sending 300 military advisors to Iraq to — here it comes — to help him continue the same nothingness of simply “monitoring” the situation. He also took time to advise the enemy that there were no impending air strikes being considered and that he would not be sending troops back in. Who’s side is this guy on?! Not ours! To President Obama ISIS is not the enemy, it is the victim.

    OTHER SCANDALS

  77. Obama Reported to Have Muslim Brotherhood Supporters on Staff!

    Eygptian news sources are reporting this. “An Egyptian magazine claims that six American Islamist activists who work with the Obama administration are Muslim Brotherhood operatives who enjoy strong influence over U.S. policy. The Dec. 22 story published in Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef magazine (read an IPT translation here) suggests the six turned the White House “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.” The story is largely unsourced, but its publication is considered significant in raising the issue to Egyptian readers. The six named people include: Arif Alikhan, assistant secretary of Homeland Security for policy development; Mohammed Elibiary, a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; Rashad Hussain, the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference; Salam al-Marayati, co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC); Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); and Eboo Patel, a member of President Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships…”

You can visit all the pages of the original Official Obama Administration Scandals List with the links below:

SCANDALS By Scandal Number:1-100. 101-200. 201-300. 301-400. 401-500. 501-600. 601-700. 701-800. 801-900. 901-1000. 1001-1100. 1101-1200. 1201-1300. 1301-1400. 1401-1500. 1501-1600. 1601-1700. 1701-1800. 1801-1900. 1901-2000. 2001-2100. 2101-2200. 2201-2300. 2301-2325.

SCANDALS By PAGE Name:
Page 1 – Official Obama Adnimistration Scandals List.
Page 2 – Obama Lies List.
Page 3 – The Tea Party Guide to the Obama Galaxy.
Page 4 The Obama Excuses List.
Page 5 Obama’s Broken Promises List.
Page 6 The Obama Mistakes List.
Page 7 Obama Scandals List.
Page 8 Obamacare Lies List.
Page 9 More Obama Lies.
Page 10 Official Obama Scandals & Lies List.
Page 11 The Obama-Nopoulus 26, 41 State of the Union Lies & Other Obama Scandals!
Page 12 How Many Lies Has Obama Told?
Page 13 More and More Obama Broken Promises! – 1300 & Counting!
Page 14 Obama Nominee Scandals & Other Team Obama Lies
Page 15 Obama Mistakes and Lies List.
Page 16 Never-ending List of Obama Lies
Page 17 The Best Obama Lies List
Page 18 Obamifact/ObamaWiki – The Obama List
BONUS PAGE: 310 Obamacare Lies and Broken Promises!
Page 19 Obama Promises Melt Like Snowflakes! – And We List the Snowflakes
Page 20 ObamaPedia Guide to Obama Lies
Page 21 Obama’s Endless String of Broken Promises
Page 22 Obama’s Broken Net Spending Cut Lie and 2,200 Other Fabrications!
Page 23 – Obama: “I want you to hold me Accountable!” – Okay, we will.
Page 24 – Keeping Track of Obama Lies, Broken Promises.

SCANDALS By Date:
Obama’s Youth-through-Joe the Plumber (10/25/08).
10/30/08 Aunt Zeituni-through-Urban Czar 3/1/9
Broken Earmark pledge 3/1/9-through-4/13/9 Fascist Obama tells Cops to watch out for Conservatives!
Samson Obama 4/13/9-through-Energy Hypocrisy 5/22/9
Racist Sonia Sotomayor 5/26/9-through-Inspectors General-Gate (#3!) 7/8/9
Inspectors General-Gate (#4!) 7/8/9-through-Stimulus “bang” for the buck? 8/7/9
Biden Credits Stimulus 8/7/9-through-Obama Lies to Congress #5 9/9/9
Obama Lies to Congress #6 9/9/9-through-Broken New Orleans Promise 10/16/9
Obama is for drilling?! 10/16/9-through-Jarrett Disagrees with Obama 12/3/9
Obama Lies About Troops 12/3/9-through-Appoints a Transgender 1/5/10
Obama Shock & Awe 1/7/10-through-Obama Disagrees with Himself 1/28/10
Obama’s BS on Lobbyists 1/28/10-through-Obama’s Fake & Staged Obamacare Summit 2/24/10
Obamacare Nightmare gets worse 2/24/10-through-Obama screws up on pre-existing coverage for kids 3/24/10
Obama buys 2 Obamacare Votes 3/24/10-through-Obama stimulus didn’t save teacher jobs after all 5/7/10
Obama Gulf Oil Blunder 5/7/10-through-Obama’s Caribou Coffee Cover-Up 6/29/10
Team Obama says Taliban is Stronger now! 6/29/10-through-Obama again promises to work on economy 9/1/10
Gibbs Lies about Obama 9/1/10-through-Gibbs Flip-flops on Chamber of Commerce 10/17/10
Obama says Americans Don’t Think Clearly! 10/19/10-through-Obama stimulus a complete failure 12/5/10
Bonus Page: 310 Obamacare Lies!
Obama’s Wiki Failure 12/5/10-through-Obama’s State of Confusion Address 1/25/11
Obama’s State of Confusion continued 1/25/11-through-Obama’s Ambassador Forced to Resign 3/20/11.
Obama Libyan Scandals (#4)-through-Obama’s Fake Debt Concern Speech Lie # 23.
More Obama fake debt concern-through-Obama lying about cause of poor economy 6/10/11.
Obama Lying About Border Security 6/10/11-through-Obama’s Lie About Not Resting Until Every American Had a Job! 8/18/11.
Team Obama stops deportations of democrat voters-through-Unions Laboring over why Obama is governing “small.”

A Complete Timeline of Obama’s Anti-Israel Hatred

by Ben Shapiro20 Mar 2015

On Thursday, the press announced that the Obama administration would fully consider abandoning Israel in international bodies like the United Nations.

According to reports, President Obama finally called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to congratulate him – but the “congratulations” was actually a lecture directed at forcing Netanyahu to surrender to the terrorist Palestinian regime.

For some odd reason, many in the media and Congress reacted with surprise to Obama’s supposedly sudden turn on Israel. The media, in an attempt to defend Obama’s radicalism, pretend that Netanyahu’s comments in the late stages of his campaign prompted Obama’s anti-Israel action.

But, in truth, this is the culmination of a longtime Obama policy of destroying the US-Israel relationship; Obama has spent his entire life surrounded by haters of Israel, from former Palestine Liberation Organization spokesman Rashid Khalidi to former Jimmy Carter National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, pro-Hamas negotiator Robert Malley to UN Ambassador Samantha Power (who once suggested using American troops to guard Palestinians from Israelis), Jeremiah Wright (who said “Them Jews ain’t going to let him talk to me”) to Professor Derrick Bell (“Jewish neoconservative racists…are undermining blacks in every way they can”). Here is a concise timeline, with credit to Dan Senor and the editors of Commentary:

February 2008: Obama says while campaigning, ‘There is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel that you’re anti-Israel.” At the time, as Dan Senor pointed out in The Wall Street Journal, Israel was run by the Kadima government run by Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni, and Shimon Peres, and was attempting desperately to bring the Palestinians to the table. Instead, the Palestinians launch war, as always.

June 2008: Obama tells the American Israel Public Affairs Conference that Jerusalem ought to remain undivided, attempting to woo Jewish votes. He then walks that back the next day, saying only that the capital shouldn’t be divided by barbed wire.

March 2009: The Obama administration reverses the Bush era policy of not joining the United Nations Human Rights Council. Secretary of State Clinton said, “Human rights are an essential element of American global foreign policy,” completely neglecting the UNHRC’s abysmally anti-Semitic record. The Washington Post reported that the administration joined the Human Rights Council even though they conceded that it “has devoted excessive attention to alleged abuses by Israel and too little to abuses in places such as Darfur, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe.”

May 2009: Obama tells Netanyahu that “settlements have to be stopped in order for us to move forward.” Netanyahu announces a settlement freeze to comply. The Palestinians refuse to negotiate. Obama then slams Israel: “they still found it very hard to move with any bold gestures.”

June 2009: Obama tells the world in his infamous Cairo speech that Israel was only created based on Jewish suffering in the Holocaust. He then says that Palestinians have been similarly victimized by the Jews: “They endure the daily humiliations – large and small – that come with occupation. So let there be no doubt: the situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable. America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own.”

July 2009: Obama threatens to put “daylight” between the United States and Israel. He tells Jewish leaders, “Look at the past eight years. During those eight years, there was no space between us and Israel, and what did we get from that?” Except for Israel forcibly removing thousands of Jews from the Gaza Strip, the election of Hamas, and the launch of war by the Palestinians and Hezbollah, nothing happened. Obama then lectures the Jews about the need for Israeli “self-reflection.” The same month, Obama tells CNN that the United States would “absolutely not” give Israel permission to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities.

September 2009: Obama tells the United Nations that “America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.” Obama’s definition of Israeli settlements, as the world soon learned, included building bathrooms in a home already owned by Jews in East Jerusalem. Obama offers no serious criticism of the Palestinians.

March 2010: Obama follows up on his threatening language about settlements by deploying Vice President Joe Biden to Israel, where Biden rips into the Israelis for building bathrooms in Jerusalem, the eternal Jewish capital. Hillary Clinton then yells at Netanyahu for nearly an hour on the phone, telling him he had “harmed the bilateral relationship.” David Axelrod calls the building plans an “insult” to the United States. When Netanyahu visits the White House a week and a half later, Obama makes him leave via a side door.

April 2010: Obama refuses to prevent the Washington summit on nuclear proliferation from becoming an Arab referendum on the evils of Israel’s nukes.

June 2010: An anonymous “US defense source” leaks to the Times of London that Israel had cut a deal with the Saudis to use their airspace to strike Iran. The deal is scuttled.

May 2011: The State Department labeled Jerusalem not a part of Israel. The same month, Obama demanded that Israel make concessions to the Palestinians based on the pre-1967 borders, which Israelis call the “Auschwitz borders” thanks to their indefensibility.

November 2011: Obama and French president Nicolas Sarkozy are caught on open mic ripping Netanyahu, with Sarkozy stating, “I can’t stand him, he’s a liar,” and Obama replying, “You’re tired of him? What about me? I have to deal with him every day.”

December 2011: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton rips into the State of Israel, stating that it is moving in the “opposite direction” of democracy. She said that Israel reminded her of Rosa Parks, and that religious people not listening to women sing – a millennia-long policy among some segments of the Orthodox – reminds her of extremist regimes, adding that it seemed “more suited to Iran than Israel.

February 2012: Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta tells David Ignatius at the Washington Post that the possibility he worried about most was that Israel would strike Iran. The Post then adds, “Panetta believes there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June – before Iran enters what Israelis described as a ‘zone of immunity’ to commence building a nuclear bomb.” The goal: to delay any potential Israeli strike.

March 2012: NBC News somehow gains information from “senior Obama administration officials” that Israel had financed and trained the Iranian opposition group Mujahideen-e-Khalq, and adds that the Obama administration had nothing to do with hits on Iranian nuclear scientists. More daylight. More leaks. The same month, Foreign Policy receives information from “four senior diplomats and military intelligence officers” that the “United States has recently been granted access to Iran’s northern border.” Foreign Policy also reports that a “senior administration official” has told them, “The Israelis have bought an airfield, and the airfield is Azerbaijan.” Again, a potential Israeli strike is scuttled. The same day as the Foreign Policy report, Bloomberg reports a Congressional Research Service report stating that Israel can’t stop Iran’s nuclear program in any case. Columnist Ron Ben-Yishai of Yidioth Ahronoth writes that the Obama administration wants to “erode the IDF’s capacity to launch such strike with minimal casualties.”

June 2012: In an attempt to shore up the Jewish vote, top members of the Obama administration, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and then-CIA director Leon Panetta were quoted by David Sanger of The New York Times talking about the President’s supposedly deep involvement in the Stuxnet plan to take out Iran’s nuclear reactors via computer virus. Until that point, it had been suspected but not confirmed that Stuxnet was an Israeli project. The Obama administration denied leaking the information. A year later, the State Department released emails showing that Sanger had corresponded regularly with all the top Obama officials, including correspondence on Stuxnet.

December 2012: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks at the Saban Forum on US-Israel Relations, where she says that Israelis have a “lack of empathy” for Palestinians, and that the Israelis need to “demonstrate that they do understand the pain of an oppressed people in their minds.”

March 2013: Obama forces Netanyahu to call Islamist Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan to apologize for Israel’s actions to stop a terrorist-arming flotilla from entering the Gaza Strip to aid Hamas. Erdogan had recently labeled Zionism racism.

May 2013: Members of the Obama Pentagon leak information that Israel attacked the Damascus airport to stop a shipment of weapons to terrorist groups. Obama officials actually had to apologize for this leak, since it endangered American lives. They blamed “low-level” employees.

June 2013: The Obama administration leaks specific information regarding Israeli Arrow 3 anti-ballistic missile sites. Weeks later, US sources tell CNN that Israel attacked a Syrian installation full of Russian-provided missiles. The same month, “American intelligence analysts” tell the New York Times that Israeli strikes had not been effective. All that information was classified.

June 2014: Three Jewish teenagers are kidnapped, including an American, and murdered by Hamas. The Obama administration immediately calls on Israel for restraint, and says it will continue to work with a Palestinian unity government including Hamas. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki says that the Obama administration wants “the Israelis and the Palestinians continue to work with one another on that, and we certainly would continue to urge that… in spite of, obviously, the tragedy and the enormous pain on the ground.” Throughout the ensuing Gaza War, in which Hamas fired rockets at Israeli civilians and tunnels were uncovered demonstrating Hamas’ intent to kidnap Israeli children, the Obama administration criticized Israel’s prosecution of the war.

August 2014: In the middle of a shooting war, Obama stopped weapons shipment to Israel. According to the Wall Street Journal, Obama found out that Israel asked the Defense Department for shipments of Hellfire missiles. Obama personally stepped in and blocked the shipments.

October 2014: Jeffrey Goldberg, court Jew for the Obama administration, releases an article in The Atlantic quoting Obama officials calling Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “chickenshit.” Goldberg, naturally, blames Netanyahu (of course, he also wrote in 2008 that any Jew who feared Obama on Israel was an “obvious racist”).

January 2015: Obama deploys his campaign team to defeat Netanyahu in Israel. A group titled “One Voice,” funded by American donors, pays for the Obama campaign team, led by Obama 2012 field director Jeremy Bird. The announcement comes days after Speaker of the House John Boehner’s invite to Netanyahu to speak before a joint session of Congress. Obama quickly announced he would not meet with Netanyahu, making the excuse that the meeting would come too close to the election.

March 2015: Netanyahu wins. Obama refuses to call him to congratulate him for two days. When he does, he threatens to remove American support in the international community, even as he moves to loosen sanctions and weapons embargoes on Iran.

Nothing has changed. Obama is who he always was. The mask has simply been removed.

Ben Shapiro is Senior Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News and author of the new book, The People vs. Barack Obama: The Criminal Case Against The Obama Administration (Threshold Editions, June 10, 2014). He is also Editor-in-Chief of TruthRevolt.org. Follow Ben Shapiro on Twitter @benshapiro.

 

A Churchill for Our Times

by Thomas Sowell March 17, 2015 12:00 AM
Like the great British prime minister, Netanyahu is warning the free world of mortal dangers it would just as soon ignore. When Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed a joint session of Congress on March 3rd, it was the third time he had done so. The only other person to address a joint session of Congress three times was the legendary British prime minister, Winston Churchill.
The parallels between the two leaders do not end there. Both warned the world of mortal dangers that others ignored, in hopes that those dangers would go away. In the years leading up to World War II, Churchill tried to warn the British, and the democratic nations in general, of what a monstrous threat Hitler was. Despite Churchill’s legendary status today, he was not merely ignored but ridiculed at the time, when he was repeatedly warning in vain.
Knowing that his warnings provoked only mocking laughter in some quarters, even among some members of his own party, he said on March 14, 1938 in the House of Commons, “Laugh but listen.” Just two years later, with Hitler’s planes bombing London, night after night, the laughter was gone. Many at the time thought that Britain itself would soon be gone as well, like other European nations that succumbed to the Nazi blitzkrieg in weeks (like France) or days (like Holland).
How did things get to such a desperate situation, with Britain alone continuing the fight, and struggling to survive, against the massive Nazi war machine that now controlled much of the material resources on the continent of Europe?
Things got that desperate by following policies strikingly similar to the policies being followed by the Western democracies today, including some of the very same notions and catchwords being used today. Just recently, a State Department official in the Obama administration said that Americans have remained safe in a nuclear age, not because of our own nuclear arsenal but because “we created an intricate and essential system of treaties, laws, and agreements.” If “treaties, laws, and agreements” produced peace, there would never have been a Second World War.
The years leading up to that monumental catastrophe were filled with international treaties and arms control agreements. The Treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War, imposed strong restrictions on Germany’s military forces — on paper. The Washington Naval Agreements of 1922 imposed restrictions on all the major naval powers of the world — on paper. The Kellogg-Briand pact of 1928 created an international renunciation of war — on paper. The Munich agreement of 1938 produced a paper with Hitler’s signature on it that British prime minister Neville Chamberlain waved to the cheering crowds when he returned to England, and said that it meant “Peace for our time.” Less than a year later, World War II began.
Winston Churchill never bought any of this. He understood that military deterrence was what preserved peace. With England playing a leadership role in Europe, “England’s hour of weakness is Europe’s hour of danger,” he said in the House of Commons in 1931. Today, with the Obama administration “leading from behind” — in practice, not leading at all — we see in Ukraine and the Middle East what that produces. As for disarmament, Churchill said in 1932, “Alone among the nations, we have disarmed while others have rearmed.”
Today, the United States has that dubious and reckless distinction. Our pacifists, like those in England during the 1930s, argue that we should disarm to “induce parallel” behavior by others. In England between the two World Wars, the rhetoric was that they should disarm “as an example to others.” Whether others would follow that example was just as dubious then as it is today. While Russia and China increased the share of their national output that went to military spending in 2014, the United States reduced its share.
Churchill deplored the “inexhaustible gullibility” of disarmament advocates in 1932. That gullibility is still not exhausted in 2015. “Not one of the lessons of the past has been learned, not one of them has been applied, and the situation is incomparably more dangerous,” Churchill said in 1934. And every one of those words is more urgently true today, in a nuclear age.
— Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His website is http://www.tsowell.com. © 2015 Creators Syndicate Inc.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415475/churchill-our-times-thomas-sowell

 

Real Men Don’t Get "Offended"

“That’s offensive!”  … said no great man, ever.

ManlyMan Link4

Ah, the year 2015.  We’re find ourselves at the perfect intersect of political correctness, tolerance and “white male privilege”. Legend has it that at this crossroad you can sell your soul to a transgendered devil for reality tv fame and fortune.  What an enlightening time to be alive.

All of these things are not only mildly annoying, but have actually led to us to the precipice of man.  Men no longer assume the responsibility of leading their family, because feminists have told them that male leadership is no longer intrinsically necessary.  Men no longer teach their sons how to become a man, because maybe their son played with a Barbie once. Many men no longer challenge themselves, or live what Theodore Roosevelt called “the strenuous life,” because they’ve been told that accepting themselves for who they are is more important than the growth that comes with discomfort.

Never is the fall of masculinity more clearly on display than when grown, adult men pull out the “offended” card.  Any man who goes about with the word “offensive” on his lips should be boiled with his own pudding… or promptly have his man-card revoked, one of the two.

Why is it that we all inherently get that sense of disgust, that feeling of embarrassment for a man who wines about being “offended” but not many of us can articulate as to the reason?  Just why are we so repulsed by men (usually liberal) who fervently take “offense”?

It’s simple. Both men and women respect men who take ownership, men who take action.  Choosing to “be offended” is the epitome of inaction. Today’s “offended” men are seen as wimpy simply because they are.  Instead of harnessing whatever affront is facing them, instead of facing it head-on, dealing with the problem and coming out the other side a stronger man, the “modern” male chooses to sulk, to whine, and inevitably call Gloria Steinem.

We don’t need any more “offended” men, we need more leaders.  We don’t need any more professional protestors, we need more husbands. We don’t need anymore filthy, coffeehouse hipsters, we need more fathers.

So the next time you men think about choosing to “be offended” by something somebody else says or does, put down the chocolate and midol and take control over your own life.  Stop being “offended” and start taking action. You’ll be glad you did.

Plus, chicks dig it.

Read more at http://louderwithcrowder.com/real-men-dont-get-offended/

The Latest Episode

Contra Radio Network, also available on Tunein.com and itunes

Contra Radio Network Programing Alert

My guest Wednesday, March 11 at 8:30 pm, cst will be Thornton D. “TD” Barnes. Thornton has had a career at Area 51 / Grooms Lake. His books include ” My Journey to Area 51, MIGS over Nevada: MIG exploitation projects at Area 51, EMP Nuclear Winter, Hanson’s War. He will be available for any call in questions during the show. www.blogtalkradio.com/contraradio

'My guest Wednesday, March 11 at 8:30 pm, cst will be Thornton D. "TD" Barnes.  Thornton has had a career at Area 51 / Grooms Lake.  His books include " My Journey to Area 51, MIGS over Nevada: MIG exploitation projects at Area 51,  EMP Nuclear Winter, Hanson's War.  He will be available for any call in questions during the show.  www.blogtalkradio.com/contraradio'

John Jeffers

Post Navigation

%d bloggers like this: