5 Most Absurd Ways the Left Has Responded to the 2016 Election
5 Most Absurd Ways the Left Has Responded to the 2016 Election
Commentary By Andrew Kloster Andrew R. Kloster is a legal fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, focusing on civil rights, the role of the f…
By Dr. S. Flint March 4, 2015 12:32
The most important thing you should know about antibiotics!
Never expect a doctor to phone-in a prescription for an antibiotic without seeing you first. Why? To ensure your illness is in fact a bacterial infection, as viruses do not respond to antibiotics.
For example Influenza is a virus infection – this is why your doctor will never prescribe you antibiotics for this.
Knowing the difference between a viral and bacterial illness may save you time and money. Here are four tips to help you determine when an illness could be viral or bacterial. Take this advice only when you can’t see a doctor (when SHTF):
If you are diagnosed with a bacterial illness, typical antibiotic treatment is 10 to 14 days.
A person is no longer considered contagious once on an antibiotic for 24 hours and any fever has been resolved. (Source – Dr. Linda Petter)
If your symptoms do not resolve, or if at any time you develop a severe headache or neck pain, persistent nausea / vomiting or a fever, be sure to see a doctor promptly.
What Antibiotics to Stockpile
No antibiotic is effective against every type of microbe. Certain ones will kill aerobic bacteria, others are used for anaerobic bacteria, still others are effective against resistant strains, and certain people are allergic to or intolerant of various antibiotics.
Instead of buying 10 types of antibiotics (many having similar substances) you should consider 4-5 with totally different actions, so if the bacteria is resistant to one of them, you have 4 totally different “solutions” to try.
This, of course, only if you don’t have access to a clinic where they can test the bacterial resistance to these antibiotics first.
For example if you took Amoxicillin with no effect, there is no need to try other penicillin based antibiotics (Carbenicillin, Cloxacillin, Flucloxacillin, Oxacillin, Methicillin an so on) so you can exclude a wide range.
But the antibiotics listed bellow should work for most bacterial diseases, including Most Common Biological Weapons (like Anthrax – 90% mortality without treatment in the first 3-6 days).
The 4 Antibiotics You’ll Need
Amoxicillin is a penicillin antibiotic used to treat many different types of infection caused by bacteria, such as tonsillitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, gonorrhea, and infections of the ear, nose or throat.
Amoxicillin is also sometimes used together with another antibiotic called clarithromycin – the second one – to treat stomach ulcers caused by Helicobacter pylori infection.
Update – at the suggestion of Dr. M (comment area): Augmenting is also a very good option. It’s basically an upgraded amoxicillin (contains amoxicillin + clavulanate potassium) but with increased (mild) side-effects: stomach discomfort with mild cramping and diarrhea. I know it’s OK for most of people. I personally tried it 2 times and I had the bad luck of happening to me.
Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic. It fights bacteria in your body.
Clarithromycin is used to treat many different types of bacterial infections affecting the skin and respiratory system. If the bacteria seems to be resistant to Amoxicillin, this is the next best thing one should try when SHTF.
Contains Erythromycin and can be substituted with. Don’t take both antibiotics at the same time.
Update – at the suggestion of Dr. M (comment area): Zithromax (also a macrolide antibiotic) is a very good (better in many ways) substitute for Clarithromycin. But it is less active against Helicobacter pylori.
Ciprofloxacin is an antibiotic in a group of drugs called fluoroquinolones.
Ciprofloxacin is useful for anthrax, urinary tract and prostate infections, diverticulitis and many forms of pneumonia and bronchitis.
Metronidazole belongs to a class of antibiotics known as nitroimidazoles.
Metronidazole is used to treat parasitic and bacterial infections including Giardia infections of the small intestine, colon infections, liver abscess, vaginal infections (not yeast), fungating wounds, intra-abdominal infections, lung abscess and gingivitis.
How to store antibiotics?
Every antibiotic has its own particular decay rate, as proteins (oligopeptides) are subject to hydrolyzation, the main form of attack (heat and moisture are the enemy).
So, if you plan on long term storage, the individual foil packs are the best choice. Then pack them in sealed containers with dessicants to be sure.
For how long is it still safe to take antibiotics after the expiration date?
The American Medical Association (AMA) conducted a study and concluded that the actual shelf life of some products is longer than the labeled expiration date.
Manufacturers put expiration dates on for marketing, rather than scientific, reasons,” said Mr. Flaherty, a formal pharmacist at the FDA. “It’s not profitable for them to have products on a shelf for 10 years. They want turnover.”
With time, most antibiotics simply become less effective.
So maybe the question should be “for how long these antibiotics are expected to still have effects?”
Amoxicillin (tablets) – 5 years after the expiration date;
Clarithromycin and Doxycycline (tablets) – 5 years after the expiration date;
Ciprofloxacin (tablets) – 10 years after the expiration date;
Metronidazole (tablets) – 3 years after expiration date;
I hope you found this information useful. This is a guest post from Dr. S. Flint.
Since the media is now positively drooling over the chance to blame Republicans for this tragedy, here are 11 things about the Amtrak crash that are practically guaranteed not to make it on CNN.
1. The Federal Government Owns and Operates Amtrak
Because train travel is an 18th century invention, by 1971 the passenger train business was virtually dead, having been replaced by planes and other forms of transportation. Instead of changing with the times, the federal government decided it would be a wonderful idea to form Amtrak.
Nothing says progress like staying with the 1800s!
2. Amtrak Loses Hundreds of Millions of Dollars a Year
A law was passed in 1997 that required Amtrak to become profitable by 2002. Yet since 2009, Amtrak has lost somewhere around $2 billion.
The federal government can’t even follow its own laws — not that that’s a surprise.
3. American Taxpayers Subsidize a Service They Don’t Use
Most Amtrak lines service what’s known as the Northeast corridor, where the crash took place. Most of the taxpayers subsidizing this government owned and operated service do not live there. So we (and future generations) are funding yet another government service almost none of us use.
4. A Very Small Percentage of the Population Use a Government Service We All Pay For
There are more than 300 million people in America, yet ridership is only around 25 million per year. Yet these ridiculously low numbers won’t stop the government from continuing to fund Amtrak.
5. Amtrak Has Already Been Subsidized to the Tune of a Whopping $45 billion
Since the government took it over, Amtrak has sucked up about $45 billion in taxpayer-funded subsidies over the last 44 years. Just what that money could have actually been used for … medicine, food, advancements in technology. Or how about lowering tax rates?
But the government decided it would be better to use it to fund a train.
6. Amtrak Is Set to Receive Another $7 Billion Over the Next 5 years
The same media that is telling you that Amtrak is underfunded because Republicans are terrible and evil is not telling you that Amtrak will receive $7 billion in handouts through 2020.
7. Amtrak Is Not Underfunded; It Is Criminally Mismanaged
The average onboard employee of Amtrak made $41.19 an hour as of 2012. Meanwhile, in the rest of America, railroads that contracted out services to private companies paid their employees $7.75 to $13.00 an hour. On top of that, regulations and poor oversight allowed employees to pocket $185 million in overtime pay in 2013 — because $41.19 an hour isn’t nearly enough.
8. American People Subsidize $60 of Every Amtrak Ticket Sold
When you break down the numbers the math is painfully clear. If only 25 million people ride the train, that means that for every person boarding a train, the American people are paying $60.
According to Amtrak’s website, a ticket from New York City to Washington, D.C., will cost $69. You do the math.
9. Taxpayers Subsidize Passengers Who Can Afford to Make Amtrak Profitable
Most people who ride Amtrak are not poor Americans trying to get to work. They are people who could afford to pay the ticket price, or find another way to get to work, including many of our liberal media friends who are crying for more federal spending.
But the government has decided that you and I and everyone else who pays taxes should subsidize the train ride for people who could easily pay for it themselves.
A 1997 Cato Institute Study makes this painfully clear, and there is no reason to suspect anything has changed since then:
“The poor are less likely to travel by Amtrak than by most other travel options. Only 13 percent of Amtrak passengers have incomes below $20,000. The average Amtrak rider has a higher household income than the average taxpayer. In fact, the clientele for Amtrak Metroliner service between Washington and New York consists largely of Wall Street traders, K Street lobbyists and other affluent business travelers.”
10. There Is No Good Reason for The Government To Own Amtrak
Other than the screaming media pundits, there is no justifiable reason not to give Amtrak away for free to a private business that can make it profitable and save the taxpayers billions. Of course that would mean the government would lose control of something, which is an unspeakable horror to the liberal elite.
Many on the left would simply be terrified that they might have to pay for something they use. Well, that’s how capitalism works: You use something, you pay for it. Don’t like it? Maybe Russia would subsidize a ticket to Moscow.
11. The Amtrak Derailment Might Be Yet Another Failure of the Federal Government
Although it’s far too soon to say what caused this terrible crash, we do know who owns Amtrak — the federal government. We also know that Amtrak consistently wastes money on unnecessary lines and exorbitant labor costs instead of investing in safety (H/T Breitbart).
If the infrastructure of the line is found to be responsible for this crash, the blame should lie at the feet of the federal government, which has no business trying to run Amtrak in the first place.
Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson, a black man well-known for his criticism of the black community, just dropped an eye-opening truth bomb in an essay that quickly went viral.
“As I watch the racial unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, I can’t help but compare the behavior of blacks in that city to that of spoiled rotten children,” Peterson wrote at the beginning of his powerful op-ed.
Though he criticized the black community for their violent, racially motivated actions after a black criminal was killed by police, his primary point was that if “white America” would stop fearing being labeled as racists and condemn the actions of the blacks who burn down cities, change might actually take place.
He drove that point home using Mo. Gov. Jay Nixon as an example, pointing out how he immediately surrendered to radicals in the black community and tried to sympathize with them, which was awkward and futile, at best.
“Nixon tried to appease the black mob and prematurely called for a ‘vigorous prosecution’ of Officer Darren Wilson,” Peterson wrote, explaining how his efforts backfired, didn’t gain an ounce of respect from the black community and actually increased racial tensions.
Concluding his compelling piece, Peterson made three assertions based on a world in which whites said “no” to being labeled “racist” for calling black cultural failures for what they are — failures.
If whites said “No,” Sharpton and Holder would be out of business.
If whites said “No,” it would give misguided blacks a chance to examine their hearts and repent of their wicked ways.
If whites said “No,” their children would be inspired by their courage.
Peterson pointed out that this is all possible, ending his op-ed with, “This kind of transformation is possible for America, but only ‘if …’” (H/T WND)
The reverend raised a plethora of solid points, including the fact that a majority of the black community rushed to false judgment about Darren Wilson before he was given a chance for due process, simply for what Peterson called “racial vengeance,” which is exactly what’s happened in every similar case since — including the complicated situation in Baltimore, with police charged in the death of criminal Freddie Gray.
It’s too bad that we don’t have more Reverend Petersons to drown out the race baiting from men like Al Sharpton, Eric Holder and President Obama, who are doing far more harm than good.
We agree with Peterson that white leaders, and whites in general, need to refuse to accept being labeled as “racist” for condemning the lawless or morally corrosive actions of anyone, including blacks